>So, here is the Question: > >"Where we actually KNOW that Y2K damage will >not occur, is it necessary to force the issue >of compliant displays, in the face of active >resistance?" > >I await your erudite comments. > ----- Hi Chris No. On a Y2K compliance project we would flag that as a "cosmetic" hit and leave it up to the client to decide if they want to do more about it. Our recommendation would be to leave well enough alone. We're trying to keep our feet on the ground through all this and not go totally OTT. Cheers Michael <>< Michael Gerner UNIBOL: PROPRIETARY MADE OPEN FOR S/3X & AS/400! Senior Consultant GO2000... MAKING APPLICATIONS DATE INTELLIGENT. Unibol Ltd., Hydepark House, Mallusk Road, Newtownabbey, BT36 8WU, U.K. mg@bfs.unibol.com http://www.unibol.com Fax/Tel:+44 1232 837707/833422 >